Max Cook Max Cook's Profile Page

Max Cook Max Cook

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

どのようにThe Open Group OGEA-103認定試験の準備をしているか

P.S. JPNTestがGoogle Driveで共有している無料かつ新しいOGEA-103ダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-TmBSt1TtGDEI_F61jJhyELsMrI95Y5t

短時間で給料を2倍にしたいですか？はい、それは夢ではありません。 OGEA-103最新の学習ガイドがお手伝いします。 IT分野は競争が激しくなっています。 The Open Group認定は、そのために役立ちます。最新のOGEA-103学習ガイドで認定を取得すると、キャリアが変わる可能性があります。 The Open Groupの会社または製品に関する仕事に応募する場合、有用な認定資格は非常に優れた利点をもたらします。 OGEA-103の最新の学習ガイドのほんの数十ドルが、100％合格試験と24時間のワーム支援サービスを支援します。

変化する地域に対応するには、問題を解決する効率を改善する必要があります。これは、OGEA-103試験に対処するだけでなく、多くの側面を反映しています。 OGEA-103実践教材は、あなたがそれを実現するのに役立ちます。これらの時間に敏感な試験の受験者にとって、重要なニュースで構成される高効率のOGEA-103の実際のテストは、最も役立つでしょう。定期的にそれらを練習することによってのみ、あなたはあなたに明らかな進歩が起こったのを見るでしょう。 OGEA-103試験問題は、支払い後すぐにダウンロードできます。成功への旅を今すぐ始めましょう

>> OGEA-103日本語認定 <<

OGEA-103勉強資料 & OGEA-103真実試験

君はまだThe Open GroupのOGEA-103認証試験を通じての大きい難度が悩んでいますか？君はまだThe Open Group OGEA-103認証試験に合格するために寝食を忘れて頑張って復習しますか？早くてThe Open Group OGEA-103認証試験を通りたいですか？JPNTestを選択しましょう！JPNTestはきみのIT夢に向かって力になりますよ。JPNTestは多種なIT認証試験を受ける方を正確な資料を提供者でございます。弊社の無料なサンプルを遠慮なくダウンロードしてください。

The Open Group TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam 認定 OGEA-103 試験問題 (Q108-Q113):

質問 # 108
What is the purpose of the Preliminary Phase?

A. Identifying the stakeholders and their requirements.
B. Developing an Enterprise Architecture Capability.
C. Defining the Enterprise Strategy.
D. Describing the target architecture.

正解：B

解説：
An Enterprise Architecture Capability is the ability of the organization to perform effective and efficient architecture work, including the definition, governance, and management of its architectures2. The Preliminary Phase involves the following activities1:
*Reviewing the organizational context, scope, and drivers for conducting Enterprise Architecture
*Establishing the Architecture Capability desired by the organization, including the maturity level, roles, responsibilities, processes, and tools
*Defining and establishing the Organizational Model for Enterprise Architecture, which describes how the architecture function is organized and integrated within the enterprise
*Defining and establishing the Architecture Governance framework, which provides the mechanisms for ensuring the quality, consistency, and compliance of the architecture work
*Selecting and implementing the tools that support the Architecture Capability, such as repositories, modeling tools, and communication tools
*Defining the Architecture Principles that will guide and constrain the architecture work, based on the business principles, goals, and drivers of the organization
*Defining the Organization-Specific Architecture Framework, which is an adaptation of the generic TOGAF ADM to suit the specific requirements, standards, and practices of the organization The Preliminary Phase is essential for preparing the organization for the successful development and implementation of its architectures, as well as for ensuring the alignment of the architecture work with the business strategy and objectives1.
References: 1: Preliminary Phase 2: Enterprise Architecture Capability

質問 # 109
Which of the following statements about architecture partitioning is correct?

A. Partitions are defined and assigned to agile Enterprise Architecture teams.
B. Partitions are equivalent to architecture levels.
C. Partitions are used to simplify the management of the Enterprise Architecture.
D. Partitions reflect the organization's structure.

正解：C

解説：
Based on the web search results, architecture partitioning is a technique that divides the Enterprise Architecture into smaller and manageable segments or groups, based on various classification criteria, such as subject matter, time, maturity, volatility, etc.12 Architecture partitioning is used to simplify the development and management of the Enterprise Architecture, by reducing complexity, improving governance, enhancing reusability, and increasing alignment and agility12. Therefore, the statement that partitions are used to simplify the management of the Enterprise Architecture is correct.
The other statements are incorrect because:
*Partitions are not equivalent to architecture levels. Architecture levels are different layers of abstraction that describe the Enterprise Architecture from different perspectives, such as strategic, segment, and capability3.
Partitions are subsets of architectures that are defined within or across the levels, based on specific criteria1.
*Partitions do not necessarily reflect the organization's structure. The organization's structure is one possible criterion for partitioning the architecture, but it is not the only one. Other criteria, such as business function, product, service, geography, etc., can also be used to partition the architecture12.
*Partitions are not defined and assigned to agile Enterprise Architecture teams. Agile Enterprise Architecture is an approach that applies agile principles and practices to the architecture work, such as iterative development, frequent feedback, adaptive planning, and continuous delivery4. Partitions are not a specific feature of agile Enterprise Architecture, but a general technique that can be applied to any architecture method or framework, including TOGAF12.
References: 1: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Architecture Partitioning 2: TOGAF® Standard - Introduction - Architecture Partitioning 3: [The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Applying the ADM Across the Architecture Landscape] 4: TOGAF® Standard - Introduction - Definitions - The Open Group

質問 # 110
What is used to structure architectural information in an orderly way so that it can be processed to meet stakeholder needs?

A. An Architecture Framework
B. A Stakeholder Map
C. Content Metamodel
D. An EA Library

正解：A

解説：
An Architecture Framework is used to structure architectural information in an orderly way so that it can be processed to meet stakeholder needs. An Architecture Framework provides a common language and taxonomy for describing architectures; a set of tools and techniques for creating architectures; a method for defining views and viewpoints for different stakeholders; a metamodel for representing architecture artifacts; a repository for storing and managing architecture artifacts; and a governance framework for controlling architecture development and evolution. Reference: The TOGAF Standard | The Open Group Website, Section 2 Core Concepts.

質問 # 111
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
Your role is that of a senior architect, reporting to the Chief Enterprise Architect, at a medium-sized company with 400 employees. The nature of the business is such that the data and the information stored on the company systems is their major asset and is highly confidential.
The company employees travel extensively for work and must communicate over public infrastructure using message encryption, VPNs, and other standard safeguards. The company has invested in cybersecurity awareness training for all its staff. However, it is recognized that even with good education as well as system security, there is a dependency on third-parly suppliers of infrastructure and software.
The company uses the TOGAF standard as the method and guiding framework for its Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice. The CTO is the sponsor of the activity.
The Chief Security Officer (CSO) has noted an increase in ransomware (malicious software used in ransom demands) attacks on companies with a similar profile. The CSO recognizes that no matter how much is spent on education, and support, it is likely just a matter of time before the company suffers a significant attack that could completely lock them out of their information assets.
A risk assessment has been done and the company has sought cyber insurance that includes ransomware coverage. The quotation for this insurance is hugely expensive. The CTO has recently read a survey that stated that one in four organizations paying ransoms were still unable to recover their data, while nearly as many were able to recover the data without paying a ransom. The CTO has concluded that taking out cyber insurance in case they need to pay a ransom is not an option.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked to describe the steps you would take to improve the resilience of the current architecture?
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

A. You would ensure that the company has in place up-to-date processes for managing change to the current Enterprise Architecture. Based on the scope of the concerns raised you recommend that this be managed at the infrastructure level. Changes should be made to the baseline description of the Technology Architecture. The changes should be approved by the Architecture Board and implemented by change management techniques.
B. You would monitor for technology changes from your existing suppliers that could improve resilience.
You would prepare and run a disaster recovery planning exercise for a ransomware attack and analyze the performance of the current Enterprise Architecture. Using the findings, you would prepare a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture. You would prepare change requests to address identified gaps. You would add the changes implemented to the Architecture Repository.
C. You would determine business continuity requirements, and undertake a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture. You would make recommendations for change requirements to address the situation and create a change request. You would manage a meeting of the Architecture Board to assess and approve the change request. Once approved you would produce a new Request for Architecture Work to activate an ADM cycle to carry out a project to define the change.
D. You would request an Architecture Compliance Review with the scope to examine the company's resilience to ransomware attacks. You would identify the departments involved and have them nominate representatives. You would then tailor checklists to address the requirement for increased resilience.
You would circulate to the nominated representatives for them to complete. You would then review the completed checklists, identifying and resolving issues. You would then determine and present your recommendations.

正解：C

解説：
Explanation
Business continuity is the ability of an organization to maintain essential functions during and after a disaster or disruption. Business continuity requirements are the specifications and criteria that define the acceptable level of performance and availability of the business processes and services in the event of a disaster or disruption. A gap analysis is a technique that compares the current state of the architecture with the desired state, and identifies the gaps or differences that need to be addressed. A change request is a formal proposal for an amendment to some product or system, such as the architecture. A Request for Architecture Work is a document that describes the scope, approach, and expected outcomes of an architecture project123 The best answer is A, because it describes the steps that would improve the resilience of the current architecture, which is the ability to withstand and recover from a ransomware attack or any other disruption.
The steps are:
Determine the business continuity requirements, which specify the minimum acceptable level of performance and availability of the business processes and services in case of a ransomware attack. This would involve identifying the critical business functions, the recovery time objectives, the recovery point objectives, and the dependencies and resources needed for recovery.
Undertake a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture, which compares the current state of the architecture with the desired state based on the business continuity requirements. This would involve assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the current architecture, the risks and opportunities for improvement, and the gaps or differences that need to be addressed.
Make recommendations for change requirements to address the situation and create a change request.
This would involve proposing solutions and alternatives to close the gaps, enhance the resilience, and mitigate the risks of the current architecture. The change request would document the rationale, scope, impact, and benefits of the proposed changes, and seek approval from the relevant stakeholders.
Manage a meeting of the Architecture Board to assess and approve the change request. The Architecture Board is a governance body that oversees the architecture work and ensures compliance with the architecture principles, standards, and goals. The meeting would involve presenting the change request, discussing the pros and cons, resolving any issues or conflicts, and obtaining the approval or rejection of the change request.
Once approved, produce a new Request for Architecture Work to activate an ADM cycle to carry out a project to define the change. The Request for Architecture Work would describe the scope, approach, and expected outcomes of the architecture project that would implement the approved change request.
The Request for Architecture Work would initiate a new cycle of the Architecture Development Method (ADM), which is the core process of the TOGAF standard that guides the development and management of the enterprise architecture.
References: 1: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 33:
Business Scenarios 2: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter
30: Gap Analysis 3: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter
31: Architecture Change Management : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 7: Request for Architecture Work : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III:
ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 34: Business Transformation Readiness Assessment : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 30: Gap Analysis : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 31: Architecture Change Management : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part VI: Architecture Capability Framework, Chapter 50:
Architecture Governance : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 7: Request for Architecture Work

質問 # 112
Which of the following supports the need to govern Enterprise Architecture?

A. The Stakeholders preferences may go beyond the architecture project scope and needs control
B. The TOGAF standard cannot be used without executive governance
C. Best practice governance enables the organization to control value realization
D. The Architecture Project mandates the governance of the target architecture

正解：C

解説：
This statement best supports the need to govern Enterprise Architecture. Best practice governance enables the organization to control value realization by ensuring that architectures are aligned with the enterprise's strategy and objectives, meet the quality and performance requirements, and deliver the expected benefits and outcomes. The Architecture Project does not mandate the governance of the target architecture, but rather follows the governance framework established by the enterprise. The TOGAF standard can be used without executive governance, but it is recommended that executive sponsorship and support are obtained for successful architecture development and transition. The Stakeholders preferences may go beyond the architecture project scope and need control, but this is not the primary reason for governing Enterprise Architecture. Reference: The TOGAF Standard | The Open Group Website, Section 3.3.6 Architecture Governance.

質問 # 113
......

この試験に問題がある受験者向けにOGEA-103テストガイドをまとめ、簡単に合格できるようにしています。OGEA-103試験の質問が問題の解決に役立つと確信しています。信じられないかもしれませんが、私たちの学習教材を購入して真剣に検討するなら、私たちはあなたがいつも夢見ていた証明書を簡単に取得できると約束できます。 OGEA-103試験問題の高い合格率は99％〜100％であるため、OGEA-103最新の質問を購入して実践することを後悔しないと信じています。

OGEA-103勉強資料: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/OGEA-103-mondaishu

学習教材のガイダンスで経験を積むと、以前よりもOGEA-103時間を費やさず、明らかにTOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam進歩を感じることができます、The Open Group OGEA-103日本語認定だから私たちの製品はあなたにとって非常に良い選択になるでしょう、The Open GroupのOGEA-103試験はIT領域で人気がある重要な試験です、JPNTest OGEA-103勉強資料の問題集を買ったら1年間の無料オンラインのアップデートを提供する一方で、試験に失敗したら、お客様に全額で返金いたします、OGEA-103勉強資料 - TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam勉強資料に命中率が高い問題を収録されてます、OGEA-103試験に合格するのに役立つ、絶え間なく更新される試験の要求に合わせて、TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Examガイド急流を引き続きお届けします。

いつの間に結婚したんだ、あれから、誰ともうまくいかなかったの、学習教材のガイダンスで経験を積むと、以前よりもOGEA-103時間を費やさず、明らかにTOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam進歩を感じることができます、だから私たちの製品はあなたにとって非常に良い選択になるでしょう。

有難いOGEA-103｜完璧なOGEA-103日本語認定試験｜試験の準備方法TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam勉強資料

The Open GroupのOGEA-103試験はIT領域で人気がある重要な試験です、JPNTestの問題集を買ったら1年間の無料オンラインのアップデートを提供する一方で、試験に失敗したら、お客様に全額で返金いたします、TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam勉強資料に命中率が高い問題を収録されてます。

さらに、JPNTest OGEA-103ダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-TmBSt1TtGDEI_F61jJhyELsMrI95Y5t